Select Page

As a devoted academic and pioneer of peace journalism, Associate Professor Jake Lynch has established a successful career studying how conflict is reported in the media. He works in the Department of Peace and Conflict Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia, from where he has developed two peace journalism-related units. In addition to his academic work, Professor Lynch has also worked as a professional journalist, been involved in making documentary films, and, as an avid reader of historical fiction, penned a historical mystery thriller called Blood on the Stone. 

The novel is set in the 17th century at a time when the city of Oxford is hosting the English Parliament under King Charles II. As the political class converges on the city, the murder of a Member of Parliament (MP) triggers tensions that could escalate into chaos. Luke Sandys, the novel’s central character, is the city’s version of a modern-day detective and is charged with solving the crime. As a student of new science, Luke has respect for logic and evidence in his undertaking. However, he must juggle this against political plots and sectarian hatreds threatening to sow division and discord. 

Deeper Meaning 

The choice to set Blood on the Stone in Oxford is an opportunity for Professor Lynch to celebrate the city’s historical importance and highlight its intrinsic beauty. As he notes, many city areas have remained unchanged over the centuries, enabling him to paint a realistic picture for his readersThe city’s inhabitants are also very knowledgeable about the historical context that Professor Lynch uses for the novel, underlining his duty to accuracy throughout the book. 

Luke’s journey to solve the MP’s murder – together with his deputy Robshaw – by using logic, evidence and due process, draws parallels to how these elements are often set against powerful (political) interests in the modern world. As such, readers will be keen to see how Professor Lynch handles this and how it relates to real-life situations.  

Blood on the Stone is a reminder of how some authors regard novels as an empathy technology that can help readers imagine themselves in a character’s shoes throughout the narrative. This capacity to connect with audiences is powerful, as it is through appealing to their feelings and thoughts that real people can call for change. As an example, Professor Lynch recalls that readers who understood pamphlets discussing issues such as slavery on British-owned sugar plantations felt empathy for those involved, leading to public pressure for abolishing slavery.